Salvador Lopez
English 5B
Professor Baer
February 9, 2015
Logos analysis on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and Henry David Thoreau
After reading both the letter and
article from both authors. I noticed both authors try to make their point heard
through out their writings. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote his letter to the
clergy men to inform them all about the non-violent protests and their beliefs.
He felt like the people from Birmingham were being treated unfairly and
unequal. He wanted to spread equality throughout the country. Then, Henry David
Thoreau felt like the government gets into peoples ways and felt like if you
put a lot of men in charge they will seem to make bad decisions. Throughout his
writing he expresses how he feels towards the government. However, I for one
feel like Dr. King Jr used less Logos than Thoreau.
Dr.Martin Luther King Jr. himself writes,
"One may well ask: “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying
others?” The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and
unjust." In other words, Dr. King Jr. believes that some laws are unjust
due to their unfairness or inequality. I agree that some people have a right to
morally but responsibly disobey unjust laws if they do not equalize. Ethos
plays into factor, since his character answered that there is two types of laws
unjust and just. He strongly believes there is two types of laws since one
advocates breaking and then obeying such laws.
However, in Thoreaus writing he doesn't
use authorities or examples he just using a deductive type of reasoning.
For example Thoreau writes, “The
government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to
execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the
people can act through it." What Thoreau is basically trying to say in my
belief is that people have chosen to execute their will towards the government;
whereas, they do not know that the government can easily abuse their will
before the people can act against it. This claim is a logos statement because
it he is trying to persuade us by the use of reasoning.
In conclusion,
both writings share logos, but Dr. Kings writing sides more with inductive and
Thoreau sides more with the deductive reasoning. Ultimately, these are
both good writings that are trying to get their point heard throughout
everyone.
Salvador,
ReplyDeleteYou're mostly on the right track with this entry (King's argumentation is mostly inductive, and Thoreau's is mostly deductive), but the examples you provide from King's argument are examples of ethos and not logos within that piece.
-K.B.